Page 4 of 18

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:05 pm
by Starwarsgeek18
No doubt, especially around here right now it's absolutely nuts, I'll report my findings hopefully this weekend.

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:10 am
by IVLIANVS
Starwarsgeek18 wrote:My problem is sourcing the velvet would probably give my wallet a heart attack, given the current exchange rate between the US and Canada.
Velvet gives everyone's wallet a heart attack, with or without exchange rates.

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:44 am
by Crimson8
Nothing is more expensive with materials than velvet... its $45 a metre where I live! work that out when you need about 8 metres...

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:40 pm
by Starwarsgeek18
Well, I'll have to check the prices this weekend, figure out how much I need, and hopefully not have a heart attack somewhere in the middle there.

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 2:22 pm
by Starwarsgeek18
So, I'm 5' 8", how many yards total should I use?

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:09 pm
by stripes
I'm 6'2 and used 10m of fabric for each the inner lining and outer shell of the cloak... additional fabric for the inner robe, belt, etc

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:54 pm
by Starwarsgeek18
stripes wrote:I'm 6'2 and used 10m of fabric for each the inner lining and outer shell of the cloak... additional fabric for the inner robe, belt, etc
So, in a nutshell quite a bit.

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 6:34 pm
by stripes
That would be the mild way of putting it... Basically when it's all said and done, you are wearing somewhere between 25-30m of fabric

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:03 pm
by Starwarsgeek18
Wonder if the staff at Fabricland would know the guards, could eliminate some stuff...

Re: Canadian ROTJ

Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:53 pm
by Starwarsgeek18
Well, I'd say my primary search was successful. What does everyone think?http://s44.photobucket.com/user/Starwar ... sort=3&o=0

Sorry, about the double photo, didn't look like it had uploaded the first time.